Français | Castellano | English | Türkçe

Moira Mil­lán is one of the women lead­ers in the Mapuche people’s fight for the land and for free­dom. She is one of the impor­tant peo­ple rep­re­sent­ing the Mapuche women’s move­ment. Pro­tec­tors of nature and his­tor­i­cal resis­tants against the Incas and the Span­ish col­o­niz­ers, the Mapuche are an “autochto­nous peo­ple” of the South-Amer­i­can con­ti­nent. Their pres­ence on these lands goes back sev­er­al thou­sand years. Yet their legit­i­ma­cy is con­stant­ly brought in ques­tion by the Chil­ian and Argen­tin­ian gov­ern­ments, lead­ing to mas­sacres and mas­sive delocalizations.

Moira and her friends recent­ly called for sup­port. We relayed their call on Kedis­tan.


Academics, intellectuals, and social referents express their support to the indigenous women’s movement for Buen Vivir, in their “Basta de Terricidio” walk.

symbole mapuche

Manifesto for Buen Vivir

The emerging social priority today is the earth and we are spokespersons for her pain.
There can be no Buen Vivir without Justice.

Indige­nous Wom­en’s Move­ment for Buen Vivir

Memory and things

Latin Amer­i­ca, Africa and Asia make up a tri­con­ti­nen­tal his­tor­i­cal­ly tra­versed — and in the present as well — by the dra­ma of colo­nial­ism. This the­o­ret­i­cal cat­e­go­ry — with pro­found impli­ca­tions in the lives of peo­ples — can be imag­ined as geog­ra­phy impact­ed by his­to­ry. The­o­ry and prax­is that across his­to­ry and geog­ra­phy implied dif­fer­ent forms of epis­temi­cide, geno­cide, eco­cide, cul­tu­ri­cide, fem­i­ni­cide that even the nation-states in their repub­li­can and demo­c­ra­t­ic phase have nei­ther want­ed nor decid­ed to decline. Soci­eties with their silences have enabled it to con­tin­ue happening.

Colo­nial­ism — although, per­haps, it would be more per­ti­nent to say this word in the plur­al — deter­mined the loss of vital and cog­ni­tive expe­ri­ences of a huge num­ber of peo­ples. That is: the destruc­tion of their own knowl­edge and high­ly sig­nif­i­cant por­tions of their pop­u­la­tion. And the Latin Amer­i­can XXI cen­tu­ry itself (and, more specif­i­cal­ly, Indo-Amer­i­can) is still gov­erned on the basis of an active colo­nial­ism in the men­tal­i­ties and sub­jec­tiv­i­ties, in the cul­tures and in the epis­te­molo­gies that are syn­the­sized in the major­i­ty of the States that make up our con­ti­nent, and that they deprive us of access to knowl­edge that today should be in dia­logue with the hege­mon­ics in the search for solu­tions to the prob­lems we face.

When we say colo­nial­ism, we mean a sin­gu­lar social for­ma­tion defined by the for­eign inva­sion of a native pop­u­la­tion forced into super-labor exploita­tion, polit­i­cal dom­i­na­tion, and social oppres­sion. Despite this gen­er­al def­i­n­i­tion, dis­tinc­tions are need­ed to con­tex­tu­al­ize “the colo­nial”, a macro­cat­e­go­ry made up of at least two sub­units: col­o­niza­tion and colonialism.

Col­o­niza­tion is the process of expan­sion and fac­tu­al con­quest of the colonies, the sub­ju­ga­tion of anoth­er ter­ri­to­ry through force or eco­nom­ic supe­ri­or­i­ty. Thus, col­o­niza­tion indi­cates a move­ment of aggres­sion that tends to con­sol­i­date a dif­fer­en­ti­at­ed and polar­iz­ing sys­tem, since it express­es the will to con­trol, manip­u­late and sub­or­di­nate a dif­fer­ent, alter­na­tive or new world. And it express­es an unequal exchange between var­i­ous types of pow­er: between ideas about what “we” do well and “they” do not know how to do or do wrong. Colo­nial­ism (or colo­nial­i­ty, some will say) is instead a cul­tur­al and polit­i­cal real­i­ty. It indi­cates the doc­trine and polit­i­cal-insti­tu­tion­al prac­tice of col­o­niza­tion. It is pos­si­ble to imag­ine it as a sys­tem­at­ic orga­ni­za­tion of dom­i­na­tion that has endured over time. In its most gen­er­al form, it is the insti­tu­tion­al­ized dom­i­na­tion of an impe­r­i­al or colo­nial­ist state over peo­ples belong­ing to “dis­tant” civ­i­liza­tions. In this sense, it indi­cates the polit­i­cal, admin­is­tra­tive, finan­cial, eco­nom­ic, com­mer­cial, mil­i­tary and cul­tur­al dom­i­na­tion of an occu­pi­er over an occu­pied peo­ple, resid­ing in a ter­ri­to­ry more or less dis­tant from a met­ro­pol­i­tan area.

These the­o­ret­i­cal cat­e­gories, elab­o­rat­ed by lan­guages, have an impact on cog­ni­tive forms and there­fore on polit­i­cal forms. And they touch the sen­si­ble forms of the pow­er of deci­sion. Many Latin Amer­i­can states are proud to have become inde­pen­dent from the colo­nial yoke, but they have inher­it­ed and mul­ti­plied colo­nial inher­i­tances and prac­tices through their vora­cious cap­i­tal­ism, their patri­ar­chal incli­na­tion, their ideas of moder­ni­ty as progress or devel­op­ment that does not repair the irrepara­ble dam­age that it pro­duces. Oth­ers, on the oth­er hand, with sagac­i­ties, dia­logues and oth­er patience have man­aged to escape — at least in some of its folds — from that con­sti­tu­tive con­di­tion of the nation-states that make up our continent.

In the pan­dem­ic Argenti­na of the 21st cen­tu­ry, a move­ment of Indige­nous women is vibrat­ing in the present an accu­mu­la­tion of his­tor­i­cal strug­gles of at least 500 years, putting the colo­nial con­di­tion of the nation-state in cri­sis. It does so by appeal­ing to a word that cuts a gash in the fab­ric of the lan­guage — and there­fore in the cog­ni­tive and polit­i­cal forms — : terricide.

Of the syntheses

Ter­ri­cide is a fig­ure of syn­the­sis. Of epis­temi­cides, geno­cides, eco­cides, cul­tu­ri­cides, femi­cides that have occurred through­out the his­to­ry and the colo­nial present of our con­ti­nent. It means the sys­tem­at­ic exter­mi­na­tion of all forms of life, which con­cern both the tan­gi­ble and per­cep­ti­ble ecosys­tem — the ani­mat­ed beings of a for­est for exam­ple — and imma­te­r­i­al aspects, be they cul­tur­al, lin­guis­tic or sacred.

Ter­ri­cide is geno­cide because there was and is a dri­ve to sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly exter­mi­nate Indige­nous peo­ples on the part of the nation-state, a dri­ve con­cen­trat­ed in its repres­sive forces, so as not to elab­o­rate. Ter­ri­cide is eco­cide because entire ter­ri­to­ries are indis­crim­i­nate­ly destroyed and con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed ‑the for­est, the moun­tain, the jun­gle, the wet­lands, com­plete­ly dev­as­tat­ed, in an irre­versible way-; destruc­tions per­pe­trat­ed by com­pa­nies that are invad­ing and vio­lat­ing the ter­ri­to­ries with the expan­sive forms of an econ­o­my of death. Ter­ri­cide is epis­temi­cide because with col­o­niza­tion, the ways of under­stand­ing — under­stand­ing and con­ceiv­ing life on the part of Indige­nous peo­ples — have been elim­i­nat­ed. And today this oppres­sion con­tin­ues to be per­pet­u­at­ed through oppres­sive reli­gions that with their rit­u­als snatch the pos­si­bil­i­ty of pre­serv­ing and trans­mit­ting the forms of ances­tral spir­i­tu­al­i­ty and sacred spaces for each peo­ple. Ter­ri­cide is fem­i­ni­cide due to the sys­tem­at­ic mur­der of female bod­ies-ter­ri­to­ries, the result of social rela­tions typ­i­cal of cru­el­ty and pri­vate gain.

Of the subjects

Ter­ri­cide-wagers are col­lec­tive subjects.

They are the States and those gov­ern­ments inca­pable of imag­in­ing life beyond their own colo­nial prac­tices, lan­guages, cog­ni­tive forms and poli­cies. And that with their poli­cies and agree­ments con­tribute to the destruc­tion of the earth and every­thing that inhab­its it.

They are also the extrac­tivist cor­po­ra­tions that per­pet­u­ate oppres­sion and apply it to the peo­ples who main­tain reci­procity and har­mo­ny in and with the ter­ri­to­ries. And that they do so by triv­i­al­iz­ing or avoid­ing the oblig­a­tion to imple­ment the con­sul­ta­tion and obtain the pri­or, free and informed con­sent of those who will suf­fer the dis­as­ters that occur in the environment.

About the demands

Indige­nous women demand that the acts of ter­ri­cide be tried and sen­tenced. That ter­ri­cide be cod­i­fied as a crime against nature and against human­i­ty, and that it be impre­scriptible because, when it is imple­ment­ed, both human and non-human life are mur­dered, with­out dis­crim­i­na­tion or con­sid­er­a­tion. And that is a demand that chal­lenges us all, our future and that of gen­er­a­tions to come.

Pluriversity

As these walk­ers tell us,

Indige­nous Women for Buen Vivir are a plur­al move­ment made up of Indige­nous women from the 36 orig­i­nal nations. With the word ter­ri­cide we also name our pain and the dev­as­ta­tion suf­fered by the ter­ri­to­ries, our spir­i­tu­al­i­ty and our bod­ies, because in it all the ways of mur­der­ing life that the West­ern sys­tem has are encrypted.

Our move­ment walks the coun­try from its extreme north and from its extreme south. We want to pro­voke an aware­ness-rais­ing meet­ing to show that Argenti­na is a coun­try inhab­it­ed by a plu­ral­i­ty of Indige­nous nations and peo­ples. We con­sid­er that the Argen­tine State is an invad­ing state that, far from admin­is­ter­ing with wis­dom and sol­i­dar­i­ty, has invad­ed the peo­ple and its ter­ri­to­ries, plun­dered, pol­lut­ed, and destroyed them. That State shows an absolute depen­dence on the extrac­tive and mur­der­ous cor­poro­c­ra­cy that cen­ters its pow­er in oth­er parts of the world.

We walk to pro­pose a new civ­i­liza­tion­al matrix that brings us clos­er to good liv­ing as a right. We walk to make vis­i­ble that there can be no Buen Vivir if there is no justice.

Our walk is a form of utopia. We will arrive in Buenos Aires on May 24 to give the first cry of free­dom for the peo­ples and ter­ri­to­ries. And we already know that we will have to go back, insist again, reflect thought and lan­guage to build a tru­ly free, just, human soci­ety, in which Buen Vivir is a fact of the great­est human importance.

What do we Indige­nous women demand? That the TERRICIDAL ACTS be JUDGED and CONDEMNED. That TERRICIDE be con­sid­ered a crime of against NATURE and HUMANITY. An attempt is made to assas­si­nate human life as well as non-human life, with­out dis­crim­i­na­tion. We demand that ter­ri­cide be an impre­scriptible crime.

That is why we say, as long as we do not have jus­tice, for them there will be no peace.”

Tools

The Move­ment seeks to artic­u­late a tool pro­mot­ed by Indige­nous peo­ples — in dia­logue with those sen­si­tive actors from the gov­ern­ment and soci­ety — to iden­ti­fy and con­demn the sub­jects respon­si­ble for the ter­ri­cide, and fight with the objec­tive of achiev­ing justice.

This man­i­festo makes the demands of the Indige­nous Wom­en’s Move­ment for Buen Vivir its own, and invites its dis­sem­i­na­tion, accom­pa­ni­ment and mul­ti­pli­ca­tion. It is nec­es­sary, in the inevitable sense, to build a soci­ety where Buen Vivir as a right is possible.

Rallying cry

We fight against Ter­ri­cide, for the affir­ma­tion of Buen Vivir and for the recog­ni­tion of the pluri­na­tion­al­i­ty of the territories.

(If you need to print this message or the attached file, please consider doing so on reused or recycled paper. Preserving the environment means Reducing, Reusing, Recycling)

TO FOLLOW THE ACTION • Movimien­to de Mujeres Indi­ge­nas por el buen vivir Face­book, Twit­ter @mmindigenas , Insta­gram @mmujeresindigenas • Moira Mil­làn Face­book, Twit­ter @millan_moira, Insta­gram @moiraivanamillan


The trans­la­tion, in sum­ma­rized form, of the video below:

When ter­ror­ism ren­ders the air unbreath­able, you don’t solve the prob­lem with oxy­gen masks. The air must be cleaned, the earth must be cleaned. Every­thing smells rot­ten. So much impuni­ty makes us nau­seous. But we still can’t over­come our fear in order to clean our ter­ri­to­ries and free them from the ter­ri­cides and the spec­u­la­tors in death.

Thou­sands of burned hectares, added to thou­sands more, become millions.

The earth groans its dead­ly pain. And we, indige­nous women, begin to cry out with tel­luric cries our deaths and those of our daugh­ters and sons. Now, not only because of the famine, the con­t­a­m­i­na­tion, the uproot­ing of our water or the racist vio­lence. Now they are burn­ing our souls by set­ting fire to our land.

We have become dis­pos­able bod­ies, sac­ri­ficed ter­ri­to­ries, dis­pos­able lives, with­out jus­tice. They are killing the land and its guardians. And it does­n’t seem to matter.

We still don’t have the exact num­bers of areas burned this sum­mer, as the fires con­tin­ue, all inten­tion­al. We also don’t have the sta­tis­tics of fem­i­ni­cides, because they con­tin­ue to mur­der us.

They say that the indige­nous geno­cide was nec­es­sary for the birth of this bloody home­land. What birth do they hope to get from this cur­rent terricide?

It is urgent to do some­thing to stop so much death.

We, indi­ge­neous women, say: until we obtain jus­tice, there will be no peace for us.” 

https://youtu.be/cinfImWZzwE


Pho­togra­phie : Sadık Çelik

You may use and share Kedistan’s articles and translations, specifying the source and adding a link in order to respect the writer(s) and translator(s) work. Thank you.
KEDISTAN on EmailKEDISTAN on FacebookKEDISTAN on TwitterKEDISTAN on Youtube
KEDISTAN
Le petit mag­a­zine qui ne se laisse pas caress­er dans le sens du poil.