On Jan­u­ary 6th 2020 at 11 AM, 198 wom­en’s orga­ni­za­tions and asso­ci­a­tions held simul­ta­ne­ous press con­fer­ences in 48 cities across Turkey, denounc­ing the pro­ject­ed amnesty law con­cern­ing child abuse.


Français | English

This huge ini­tia­tive was launched by two plat­forms Nafa­ka Hakkı and TCK 103 Kadın in order to denounce yet anoth­er new pro­posed law that would offer a reprieve to the aggres­sor “when the child mar­ries him”, con­di­tion­al on the age dif­fer­ence between them being no more than 15 or 10 years. In oth­er words, this amnesty opens the door wide to impunity…

The cur­rent debate at the AKP cen­ters on the age dif­fer­ence between the child and the adult : 15 or 10 years? The lat­est news indi­cat­ing that the major­i­ty would tend toward the 15 year dif­fer­ence. The pro­ject­ed leg­is­la­tion should ffol­low dis­cus­sion on the 2020 bud­get at the Nation­al Assembly.

Here are the argu­ments made by the orga­ni­za­tions dur­ing the press conferences.

From deletions to reforms, as time goes by…

In 2005 already, a sim­i­lar piece of leg­is­la­tion failed because of the strug­gle by wom­ens’ orga­ni­za­tions, asso­ci­a­tions for child pro­tec­tion and human rights. But the regime con­tin­ued its under­hand­ed work, step by step…

First, the oblig­a­tion for a civ­il mar­riage pri­or to the reli­gious mar­riage was abol­ished in 2015. At the time, the law con­demned cou­ples to a jail sen­tence of 2 to 6 months if they pro­ceed­ed with a reli­gious mar­riage pri­or to the offi­cial one. Defendors of rights had not­ed that, giv­en this mod­i­fi­ca­tion, many peo­ple would no longer mar­ry offi­cial­ly. As a con­se­quence, divorces/desertions, legal prob­lems con­cern­ing the chil­dren’s affil­i­a­tion and the attri­bu­tion of alimo­ny would increase, to the detri­ment of the chil­dren and of women.

Then, in March 2016, fol­low­ing rev­e­la­tions of sex­u­al abuse on 45 chil­dren com­mit­ted with­in a reli­gious order han­dling hous­ing for chil­dren, and  extrem­ly close to the regime, then-min­is­ter for the fam­i­ly, Sema Ramazanoğlu spoke the fol­los­ing sen­tence for­ev­er inscribed in the his­to­ry of Turkey. Insist­ing on the “respectabil­i­ty” of the foun­da­tion in ques­tion, she declared: Once isn’t serious.”

In 2017, with­in the same reform autho­riz­ing reli­gious author­i­ties to per­form civil­ian mar­riages, the State allowed the direc­tors of civil­ian iden­ti­ty logs to enter births that had occurred out­side all med­ical fol­low-up, on the basis of a sim­ple oral dec­la­ra­tion. This pos­si­bil­i­ty became effec­tive in June 2018 with the estab­lish­ment of elec­tron­ic registration.

mariage enfant mariée

A care­ful look reveals that, since 2016, the regime has attempt­ed to estab­lish reforms and prac­tices open­ing the pos­si­bil­i­ty to forced pre­ma­ture mar­riages of chil­dren, and of ren­der­ing legal   facts of abuse on them. Despite all the protests and strug­gles by the orga­ni­za­tions work­ing for women and chil­dren’s pro­tec­tion, a pack of laws was pro­mul­gat­ed in 2016 reform­ing the law on abuse of chil­dren. Mod­i­fi­ca­tions to para­graphs 1 and 2 of arti­cle 103 in the Turk­ish penal code low­ered the age lim­it to 12 years. With this reform, abuse on chil­dren less than 12 years old are the only ones cov­ered by heavy sen­tences, but no expla­na­tion was pro­vid­ed to pub­lic opin­ion on the rea­sons and argu­ments moti­vat­ing the cut-off at the age of 12.

Since the age dif­fer­en­tial clause now under debate is of 10 or 15 years between the abused child and the abuser, in real terms, this means that a girl of 12 could now find her­self mar­ried to a man of 27 or 22.

Eras­ing the crime of abuse through the pos­si­bil­i­ty of mar­riage means leav­ing chil­dren fac­ing the risk of fur­ther abus­es, and/or of repeat­ed abus­es, thus con­demn­ing them to lives filled with violence.

In the con­ti­nu­ity of this reform of 2016 mak­ing 12 the legal age, we now have the regime announc­ing a future amnesty…

A coherent policy

The regime’s recent dec­la­ra­tion that “We shall effect the amnesty only once”, is in per­fect agree­ment with Sema Rama­zonoglu’s dec­la­ra­tion quot­ed above, and shows the coher­ence with which the AKP is deter­mined­ly pur­su­ing its nox­ious policies.

The regime jus­ti­fies its call for an amnesty by say­ing that “girls abused at a young age (of less than 12 years), then mar­ried (the law in 2016 allow­ing it), find them­selves alone with their chil­dren and penal­ized fol­low­ing the sen­tenc­ing of the men who com­mit­ted the abuse”.  Women and child prog­ec­tion orga­ni­za­tions denounce this by say­ing “it is as inhu­man as it is irra­tional for the State to attempt legit­imiz­ing the sex­u­al abuse of chil­dren with such excus­es, more­over, with­out com­mu­ni­cat­ing on what data and research this is based. It is impos­si­ble to study the cas­es. Do the “torn fam­i­lies”, the “iso­lat­ed vic­tims” tru­ly exist? How many are there? What are their cir­cum­stances, their problems? 

Despite the fact this is our main activ­i­ty, we learn of the top­ic of amnesty through the media and in hall­way dis­cus­sions. If the aim is tru­ly to pro­tect the chil­dren and to avoid their vic­tim­iza­tion, women and child pro­tec­tion orga­ni­za­tions have been howl­ing out the solu­tions for years.” 

Do not protect the abuser, but the child!”

Reli­gious offi­cials who per­form reli­gious mar­riages on girls below the mar­i­tal age, the fam­i­lies request­ing these mar­riages and autho­riz­ing them, as well as the wit­ness­es who close their eyes and do not car­ry out their report­ing oblig­a­tion must be con­demned along with the offi­cial figures.

For exam­ple, med­ical staff have the oblig­a­tion of declar­ing cas­es of abuse on minors received and treat­ed in their estab­lish­ment. The fact is that those among the staff who car­ry through with their dec­la­ra­tions are demot­ed and rel­e­gat­ed to the clos­et. We also know that the min­istries of Jus­tice and of Health are con­duct­ing pro­grams in order to abol­ish this oblig­a­tion. All of this, of course, in con­junc­tion with the pro­ject­ed amnesty.

Yes, there is need of a reform: clear­ly indi­cat­ing in the Turk­ish penal code that chil­dren of less than 15 years can­not be declared as con­sent­ing to sex­u­al acts. Mar­rige­able age must be set at 18. And these mat­ters must be inscribed in the laws, leav­ing no room for loop­holes or legal interpretations.”

The deputies who do not sup­port the gov­ern­ment at the Nation­al Assem­bly have declared they would do every­thing in their pow­er to stop the adop­tion of the amnesty law.

Reli­gious and patri­ar­chal pres­sure is strong in favor of these laws, in the name of a “Mus­lim Broth­ers” tra­di­tion at the base of the big­ot­ted sup­port the AKP does not want to aban­don. That tra­di­tion sup­ports abuse, denies child­hood or turns it into an object, prefer­ably in the case of girls…

In France, among oth­er places, “affairs” of “lit­er­ary pedophil­ia” raise ques­tions con­cern­ing a cer­tain sex­u­al lib­er­al­ism, that was social­ly tol­er­at­ed less than 20 years ago, now re-qual­i­fied as pedo-crim­i­nal­i­ty. Is the Turk­ish regime para­dox­i­cal­ly claim­ing that type of preda­to­ry lib­er­al­ism? All the bet­ter to rape you my child…

Some figures

Offi­cial fig­ures for the year 2019 have not been announced yet by the TUIK, Turkey’s Insti­tute for Sta­tis­tics… Let’s have a look at the “offi­cial” fig­ures for 2018.

167 youths, aged less than 15, gave birth. In the 15–17 year old age group, the fig­ure is 11 636. Of the 1 mil­lion 248 847 births, 11 803 babies were born of minors. Over 48 000 women of 18–19 years gave birth in 2019 accord­ing to avail­able fig­ures. As for minors giv­ing birth, the offi­cial fig­ures declared by the TUIK seem to reg­is­ter a low­er­ing over the pre­ced­ing years. But the fig­ure remains worrisome.

The same holds true for child mar­riages. We note a slight regres­sion in the 16–17 age group. But there are many such mar­riages, apart from the fact only declared mar­riages are account­ed for. Of the 553 202 mar­riages reg­is­tered in 2018, 3,8% involved a girl of 16–17; this rep­re­sents 20 779 such mar­riages. (For boys the fig­ure is 1 029, or 0,2%).

Need we remind the read­er that this pic­ture of Turkey suits a regime that has raised to the utmost its patri­ar­chal natal­ist policy.


Translation by Renée Lucie Bourges
iknowiknowiknowblog.wordpress.com
Vous pouvez utiliser, partager les articles et les traductions de Kedistan en précisant la source et en ajoutant un lien afin de respecter le travail des auteur(e)s et traductrices/teurs. Merci.
Kedistan’ın tüm yayınlarını, yazar ve çevirmenlerin emeğine saygı göstererek, kaynak ve link vererek paylaşabilirisiniz. Teşekkürler.
Ji kerema xwere dema hun nivîsên Kedistanê parve dikin, ji bo rêzgirtina maf û keda nivîskar û wergêr, lînk û navê malperê wek çavkanî diyar bikin. Spas.
You may use and share Kedistan’s articles and translations, specifying the source and adding a link in order to respect the writer(s) and translator(s) work. Thank you.
Por respeto hacia la labor de las autoras y traductoras, puedes utilizar y compartir los artículos y las traducciones de Kedistan citando la fuente y añadiendo el enlace. Gracia.
Naz Oke on EmailNaz Oke on FacebookNaz Oke on Youtube
Naz Oke
REDACTION | Journaliste 
Chat de gout­tière sans fron­tières. Jour­nal­isme à l’U­ni­ver­sité de Mar­mara. Archi­tec­ture à l’U­ni­ver­sité de Mimar Sinan, Istanbul.